Lawyer into a party (used for affordable housing contract dispute)

 We have the right to purchase affordable housing
used as a practicing lawyer, has represented many years of practice in a large number of various cases, but suddenly turned themselves into a party. After a year of litigation, the case is over! It made me more a deep understanding of the parties, but also increased my serious case of each party, emphasis.
case is typical of second-hand contract for the sale of affordable housing disputes in recent years because of the country, especially in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other cities real estate price increases, resulting in a lot of housing, see housing price the seller will house a variety of reasons that the original contract for the sale is invalid, in order to achieve their rate of price increases.
housing contract dispute in recent years, there are typically Note that the strict contract for the sale, pay attention to protect their legitimate rights and interests according to law.
In addition, I hereby for Zhangwan Chen (Beijing Han Heng law firm), Zhang Xiu assessment (assessment paid law firm in Beijing) on my support and help express our sincere thanks.
case brief:
2002, the selling of people Fumou to the law firm where I work, so .2003 met early in Beijing, I am ready to purchase, and studied more Office real estate. Fumou know of the situation, take the initiative to me that its the beginning of 2001 the mortgage through a bank acquired in three sets Tiantongyuan affordable housing (more than 80 levels, respectively, more than 120 peace 200 level), three sets of Housing Fumou were not living, not only to repay bank loans every month, every year to pay property charges, heating charges, due to costs associated with higher economic burden is too heavy, I hope I am able to buy her house. I have three in their comparison test suites 120 square meters that is appropriate, by mutual agreement at the January 12, 2003 signed a sale and purchase of housing, bank loan to help clear procedures for transfer B, transfer occurred when all the costs borne by the party. such as property rights can not effectively transfer, B did not check out, the two sides may agree to other methods prove housing to Party B and not sovereignty Party . Bank payment mortgage, I did not think that Fumou unauthorized breach of contract, unilateral advance payment bank mortgage loans (19 million dollars), get all the property after a complaint to my complaint to court, requested me to check out, but also I could have asked to use their houses to pay fees of 10 million yuan. which led to proceedings in the case.
I am responding to, the law filed a counterclaim, the first trial, second trial, denied the claims of Fumou to support the request of my counterclaim .
prosecution for Fumou, I answer the following key elements:
1, was the respondent take the initiative in 2003 to sell the house and the respondent, the two sides have actually fulfilled the sale and purchase agreement, was the respondent has not The actual owner of the house, no right to ask the respondent Tengfang.
2, br> 3, based on the above facts, the respondent was not entitled to claim the respondent so-called failure to pay the bank for payment, but immediately after the pay back. This can not become an excuse for breach of contract breach of trust the respondent.
5, selling when the will has been signed by the respondent was not allowed to modify the defense a good agreement people check out, but now its prosecution of the respondent, requested 收房, bad enough to see the extent of its bad faith.
6, place the root cause of this case, due to the opening of Metro Line 5, Tiantongyuan area housing prices , was the respondent regardless of man's basic moral, unscrupulous, perfidious caused, but was the respondent's claim violates the laws and are protected by the principle of good faith, not supported by law.
prosecution for Fumou I am as anti-suit:
civil complaint
counterclaims against people (the v. defendant): Zouzhong Chen, male, March 31, 1965 birth, Han, Han Heng, Beijing law firm, living in Beijing Changping District, six districts and four small mouth Tiantongyuan Unit 602, Building A, Room (1306 F, Unit 1, 6 layers of 2)
be counter-persons (v. plaintiff): Fujian Na, female, February 20, 1962 born live in Xicheng District, Beijing Xin Jie Kou Avenue A fourth floor, a 6, 23, ID number: 110106620220122
a claim, according to an order requesting the court to be counter-assisted procedures for transfer to the performance of the obligations;
Second, in this case the costs to be borne by counterclaim.
end of 2001, counterclaims and reasons for the fact that people Zouzhong Chen came to Beijing from Heilongjiang to practice law, because no temporary housing near the park in the basement of First City, with the conduct of business in Beijing in early 2003 to prepare purchase, was already in Tongzhou, Huilongguan houses were examined, etc., is that counterclaims counterclaims people who wish to purchase housing Fujian Na after the beginning of 2001, said their mortgage through a bank acquired in three sets Tiantongyuan affordable housing (respectively is more than 80 levels, more than 120 peace 200 level), three houses Fujian Na were not living, not only have to pay bank loans a month, every year to pay property charges, heating charges, due to the costs associated with pay per year compared high, people want to buy her counterclaim housing, Zou Zhongchen counterclaims were examined in comparison to its three suites of 120 square meters are considered more appropriate in full consultation by the parties January 12, 2003 signed the Department of the mortgage buyers who are counter-claim could not immediately handle the transfer process, so the two sides attached conditions, with a deadline to agree to Fujian Na by the counter-claim on behalf of people Zouzhong Chen also continue to bank loans, satisfaction of a condition, that is to pay off bank loans and then procedures for transfer, in order to obtain the actual property.
people Zouzhong Chen counterclaim after the arrival of the renovated rooms, according to the contract have been delivered had assumed Fujian Na all amounts, including the down payment, have to pay 21 months of bank loans and after the heating costs, property charges and other related costs, counterclaims after the arrival of people Zou Zhongchen property costs, heating, water, electricity, sanitation and other costs actually paid by the Zouzhong Chen has now been actually used to stay up to 5 In more than.
by the recent opening of Subway Line, Tiantongyuan housing prices, Fujian Na it bad faith, set by the two sides had signed the agreement in full consultation expense, on December 17, 2007 sued the counterclaim people Zouzhong Chen vacate the premises.
people Fujian Na indicted by a counterclaim that purchase, that is, there is no account by the Fujian Na with Beijing as buyers to circumvent the law for their own situation. because the Fujian Na on March 5, 2001 already bought this house, this time also counterclaims were Zouzhong Chen practice did not come to Beijing to Heilongjiang, Fujian Na was counterclaims were the initial purchase in 2001, the result of their own do not want to continue to bear the higher costs associated with the January 12, 2003 for transfer to a counterclaim who Zouzhong Chen used, so no matter According to the then relevant provisions of affordable housing or affordable housing under the current purchase can be traded at least 5 years relevant provisions of both the room can be traded, counterclaims buyers who have the qualification Zouzhong Chen.
both Clause 4 provides that: agreement to other methods may prove to Party B instead of the Housing Party's sovereignty. monthly repayment behavior and the behavior of people recognized by counterclaim, both parties to perform protocol behavior, but also an integral part of the agreement (to supplement the original agreement), even if the new rules, the room was a counterclaim people have purchased 5 years (the actual purchase has been nearly 7 years), but also can be transferred.
the room has to pay off bank loans, based on relevant provisions and the agreement made, the right to counterclaim were Zouzhong Chen achievements in terms agreed by the parties , that pay off bank loans made after the actual ownership of the house, was a counterclaim who Fujian Na obligation to fulfill the obligation to assist in the transfer procedure, the violation of the principle of good faith, bad faith counterclaim asked people to vacate the house at the request should not be legal support. is counterclaims counterclaims were a surprising request to use to pay housing costs 116,000 yuan, more visible the substance of their malicious actions.
hope that as the request of the People's Court sentenced.
Sincerely, Changping District, Beijing

counterclaims were the people's court; Zouzhong Chen
January 18, 2008
attached: the case of a second instance verdict

Changping District People's Court Civil Judgement
(2008) Chang-Min Chu Zi No. 129
plaintiff Fujian Na (counterclaim defendant), female, February 20, 1962 born, Han nationality, unemployed, lives in Fengtai District, Beijing Yangqiao Malibaoxi Building 5, Unit 4 402. ID number: 110106620220122.
agent Zhao Yufeng, Beijing Oriental Law Firm.
Zouzhong Chen (counterclaim plaintiff), male, March 31, 1965 birth, Han, Beijing Han Hastings lawyer, now living in Beijing, Changping District, Town, Building 1306, Unit 1, 6 Tiantongyuan layer 2. ID number: 230103196503314218.
agent Zhang Xiu assessment, evaluation, Beijing law firm salaries. < br> agent Zhangwan Chen, Han Heng Law Firm in Beijing.
the plaintiff and the defendant Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen other contract dispute case before the Court, the law formed a collegiate bench, open a court session. The plaintiff Fujian Na's agent Zhao Yufeng, the defendant Zouzhong Chen and Zhang Xiu agent evaluation, Zhang Wanchen court to participate in the proceedings. case hearing has now concluded.
Fujian Na alleged that the plaintiff: the plaintiff and the defendant met in 2001 .2003 In January, the plaintiff workers in Beijing, taking into account the defendant, hard life, should the defendant requested the two sides signed a The defendant, as the purchase of real estate mortgage proceeds for the plaintiff, the defendant requested the plaintiff to pay the mortgage payments on behalf of .2003 in January accused the plaintiff to use the housing .2007 October, the plaintiff received a bank notice that the plaintiff repeatedly there is no repayment schedule, serious damage to the plaintiff's business reputation, for which the plaintiff negotiated solution with the defendant, the defendant not only failed to admit mistakes, but also allow the plaintiff to learn the management approach and transfer of affordable housing in Beijing must be approved by statutory procedures. Therefore, the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant was invalid, according to law, since the agreement is invalid, vacate the defendant to the plaintiff should be housing. Although the plaintiff and the defendant without making use of the housing agreement, but according to the two sides to resolve this dispute without the possibility of negotiation, so the plaintiff sued: 1, decree the plaintiff and the defendant Fujian Na signed housing contract for the sale invalid Zouzhong Chen; 2, the defendant Zouzhong Chen will be located in Changping District, Beijing Dongxiaokou Street Tiantongyuan 1306 Level 6, Building 2, Unit 1, vacate housing to the plaintiff; 3, requesting that the Defendant used to pay housing costs 116,000 yuan; 4, case litigation costs borne by the defendant.
Zouzhong Chen argued that the defendant and filed a counterclaim : First, the plaintiff asked to confirm the claims of contract for the sale null and void, no legal basis. both Department of Housing, the voluntary sale and purchase agreement signed, the date of signing is established by law. according to law, violation of laws and administrative regulations, the mandatory provisions of shall be void. But in 2003, all of our laws, administrative regulations, did not account for non-Beijing people can not buy affordable housing to those who have personal, affordable housing to buy second-hand prohibition. In addition, the plaintiff and the defendant in a unit working with the plaintiff on the defendant's identity is clear, therefore, the plaintiff stated in the complaint to the prosecution of the former to know the The plaintiff, breach of trust breach of contract fabrication. Today, Beijing still does not prohibit the transaction of affordable housing, and in 2004 for the sector, the implementation of conditional contracts, compliance with the law. The house is a conditional sale and purchase agreement contract, that is, from the time the signing was established to pay the mortgage shall take effect after all. Third, the contract conditions have been achieved, should continue to perform, the defendant counter-rational . plaintiff malicious repayment terms of the contract to promote early success. the plaintiff should perform to help the accused for transfer duty. toll on the housing, there is no reason to ask for the plaintiff, the plaintiff's breach of contract reason is that house prices rose mate, so the fault rests solely with the plaintiff. Man and counterclaims counterclaims
who was on January 12, 2003 signed a sale and purchase of housing, counterclaims were paid off early by paying back the principal and the total cost of 137,425.83 yuan, was counterclaims and counterclaims of people who pay the housing, counterclaim who has been living after the renovation, and delivery fees. now that the housing money for the plaintiff malicious mortgage payment is paid in full, based on the two sides signed the housing sale benefits paid by counterclaim people 195,964.67 yuan of bank loans after the agreement was a counterclaim to the performance of the obligations for housing transfer procedures; 2, in this case the costs to be borne by counterclaim.
plaintiff Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen the defendant's counterclaim argued: First, in this appeal, the respondent's housing requirements identified sale and purchase agreement signed by both parties to return invalid houses, counterclaim by the respondent on the grounds that the respondent in the appeal of the view has been stated, there is no counterclaim. Second, the combined case facts about the respondent's counterclaim by the respondent in accordance with Article IV agreement mm conventions. Agreement is Article IV of the respondent agreed to be responsible for assisting the transfer of the obligations of the respondent, but this obligation is a prerequisite, that pay off the loan is to be the respondent, the respondent personnel obligations. But by the respondent has failed to pay off the loan, then help the respondent to transfer What? in the complaint and counterclaim, was that the respondent intends to evade the premise that intention to confuse and distort the facts. During the trial, the respondent claimed that the respondent was malicious repayment, the loan has been paid, the respondent should perform the transfer procedures, the respondent here was to buy a house even eliminating the transfer, how can such a reason it? respondent will be based on the relationship between friends houses to be transferred to the respondent, in this process, the respondent did not earn a penny, in accordance with the original transfer to be the respondent, the respondent was the respondent who said inflation for Housing Price, forgetting to request the return of housing, if it is to make money, the respondent had not sold at the original price will be housing a respondent. agreement is signed, the respondent has repeatedly urged by the respondent to pay off loans, a good procedures for transfer, but was always money to delay the respondent delayed. In October 2007 period, the respondent, when carrying out exit procedures, requiring the debt relationship can not exist in the country, the respondent how many loans to the banks for not pay off, it was found to be the respondent not only failed to pay off the loan, and pay the monthly mortgage repayment delay times, resulting in the name of the respondent's repayment record many times, serious damage to the respondent's business reputation. Even so, the respondent people are thought to cancel the agreement, but active negotiations looking to resolve the matter by the respondent, but was the respondent to the respondent not only admitted the error, but sent a letter to the respondent to another look administrative regulations, is invalid. the house is impossible to be privately sold to the respondent's, the sale of affordable housing is a strict legal procedures, the buyer of the condition also have strict requirements. In sum, Respondent asked the court to reject the request.
examined, 12 January 2003 the plaintiff Fujian Na (Party) and the defendant Zouzhong Chen (B) signed the will be located in Changping District, a small mouth street Tiantongyuan 1306, Unit 1, Level 6, Building No. 2 (now housing location: East Town, Changping District, District 1306 Tiantongyuan Level 6, Building 1, Unit 2) property sold to a B, A the direction of B to receive 137,425.83 yuan. Party B agreed to continue to do with the name of bank mortgage Party, Party B from the date of signing an agreement should be of the repayment to the bank. Otherwise, B should be the consequences of its own. A charge the cost side, while the cost of required documents will be submitted with the B notes. Party A shall assist Party B to pay off bank loans for the transfer procedures, transfer of ownership occurs when all the costs borne by the Party. Party on January 17, 2003 to pay 100,000 yuan to the whole Party, the balance on May 1, 2003 payment, the receipt of Party A shall prevail. agreement was signed the day of delivery to the defendant and the agreement of the Housing documents agreed with the defendant to pay bills. the defendant to the plaintiff one-time payment of the purchase money and other expenses totaling 137,482.30 yuan, the defendant after the arrival of the houses were renovated. Since January 2003 the defendant from the plaintiff's name began to repay the mortgage Loans up to October 2007, November 2007 the plaintiff left the housing loan principal and interest repaid a total of 195,964.67 yuan once.
another investigation, located in Changping District, East Town, 1306 Tiantongyuan Level 6, Building 1, Unit 2 Housing, affordable housing is the plaintiff in the March 5, 2002 Shun Tong from Beijing Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. purchased the same year March 11 to obtain housing in the housing the right to use certificates. aforementioned facts the plaintiff and defendant submitted by the agreement, real estate sales contracts, housing ownership certificates, bank repayment list, terminate the loan and the original statement, statement of documented evidence of the defendant.
Court held that the plaintiff Fujian Na sign an agreement with the behavior of the defendant Zouzhong Chen , is the true meaning of the two sides said, and signed the agreement did not prohibit the time re-listed on the transfer of affordable housing by the assignor or the qualifications of the relevant provisions, so the agreement should be legally valid. The two sides should follow the principle of good faith, continue to fully perform the contract. Zouzhong Chen is the first payment after the payment of the purchase and January 2003 to October 2007 bank lending, and the remaining purchase money (ie bank loans) 195,964.67 yuan paid by the Fujian Na finished, so Zouzhong Chen Shang Fujian Na 195,964.67 yuan owed unpaid purchase money. it requires the sale of housing for the plaintiff Fujian Na null and void and asked him to vacate the house and pay royalties claim housing and no factual and legal basis, the Court does not support ; for the counterclaim plaintiff Zouzhong Chen counterclaim plaintiff requested an order to repay the loan after the payment of counterclaim defendant, was a counterclaim to the performance of procedures to assist with the obligations of housing transfer claim, the evidence is true that there are good reasons to support our hospital. Summing up the appeal, in accordance with hexagonal seven nine hundred sixty-four yuan, Fujian Na counterclaim defendant within three days of receipt of such funds to help carry out counter-plaintiff Zouzhong Chen obligations for housing transfer process.
II, dismissed plaintiff's claim Fujian Na. < br> Half v. court costs two thousand six hundred and twenty yuan, the burden of the plaintiff Fujian Na (already paid). counterclaim court costs seventy yuan Fujian Na by the counterclaim defendant the burden of the entry into force of this decision within seven days to pay. If dissatisfied with the decision
can be served in the verdict this court within fifteen days from the date of submission of the complaint, according to the number of the other party to submit a copy of the appeal to pay court costs, appeals in the Beijing First Intermediate People's Court . the appeal within seven days after the expiration of the appeal does not pay court costs, according to withdraw the appeal handled automatically.
the presiding judge the jury Zhang Yufeng Ma Caiyun

the jury four years CIVIL
II OO Wang Xue
clerk on the 12th Beijing Municipal First Intermediate People's Court Civil Judgement

(2008) Yimin Zhong Zi No. 8061 No.
the appellant (plaintiff, counterclaim defendants) to pay health Na, F, February 20, 1962 born, Han nationality, unemployed, lives in Fengtai District, Beijing Yangqiao Malibaoxi Unit 4, Building 5, Room 402.
agent Zhao Yufeng, Beijing Oriental law firm .
agent Zheng, Y., Oriental, Beijing law firm.
Appellee (the trial the defendant, counterclaim plaintiff) Zouzhong Chen, male, March 31, 1965 birth, Han, Han Heng Law Beijing Firm and currently residing in East Town, Changping District, Beijing, 1306 Tiantongyuan Unit 1, Level 6, Building 2.
agent Zhangwan Chen, Han Heng Law Firm in Beijing.
for appellant Fujian Na the case of other contract dispute, refused to accept Beijing Changping District People's Court (2008) Chang-Min Chu Zi No. 129 civil judgments, this court appeal. the Court shall form a collegial panel hearing the case, hearing has now concluded.
pay Kin Na said the prosecution in the first instance, in January 2003, Fujian Na workers in Beijing, taking into account the Zouzhong Chen, hard life, should the defendant requested the two sides signed a Tiantongyuan Street Level 6, Building 1 Unit 1306 2 houses transferred to Zouzhong Chen, as buying the property from the Fujian Na mortgage, so the name of Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen requirements to pay the mortgage payments .2003 January Fujian Na to the defendant used the housing .2007 October, Fujian Na received the bank notice that many times there is no repayment schedule Fujian Na, seriously damaged the business reputation Fujian Na. To this end, Fujian Na with Zou Zhongchen negotiated solution, Zou Zhongchen Rather than admit error, but also allow the plaintiff to learn the , Fujian Na and agreement between Zouzhong Chen is invalid, under the law, since the agreement is invalid, Zou Zhongchen should vacate the house to the Fujian Na. Although the Fujian Na and Zou Zhongchen use no agreement on housing However, according to dispute may, therefore Fujian Na sued: 1, signed a decree Fujian Na and Zou Zhongchen housing contract for the sale invalid; 2, the defendant Zouzhong Chen will be located in Changping District of Beijing streets Tiantongyuan 1306 East Building small mouth Unit 1, Level 6, return of Fujian Na 2 vacate housing; 3, requesting an order Zouzhong Chen royalties paid 116,000 yuan housing; 4, case litigation costs borne by the Zou Zhongchen.
Zouzhong Chen in the first instance, claims that: a , Fujian Na asked to confirm the claims of contract for the sale null and void, no legal basis. both Department of Housing, the voluntary sale and purchase agreement signed, the date of signing is established by law. according to law, violation of laws and administrative regulations, the mandatory provisions of shall be void. But in 2003, all of our laws, administrative regulations, did not account for non-Beijing people can not buy affordable housing to those who have bought second-hand personal affordable housing prohibitions. Therefore, the two sides signed valid agreement for sale of housing. In addition, Fujian Na in a unit with the same work Zouzhong Chen, Fujian Na is very clear on the identity of Zou Zhongchen, therefore, Fujian Na mentioned in the complaint, and to know that pre-indictment , the All bank mortgage shall enter into force. Third, the contract conditions have been achieved, should continue to perform. Fujian Na malicious repayment terms of the contract to promote early success. Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen apply for transfer should fulfill the obligation to help. IV toll on the housing , Fujian Na no reason to ask, Fujian Na mate breach of contract reason is that house prices rise, all in Fujian Na fault liability.
Zouzhong Chen counterclaim in the first instance, said Zou Zhongchen has paid off Fujian Na the pre-paying back the principal and the total cost of 137,425.83 yuan, housing has been delivered, Zouzhong Chen has been living, and delivery fees. is a result of the housing mortgage money has been paid in full repayment of Fujian Na malicious, according to the two sides signed the Housing sale obligation for housing transfer procedures; 2, in this case the cost of litigation borne by the Fujian Na.
counterclaim against Zouzhong Chen, Fujian Na in the first instance, claims that:: First, in this appeal, the respondent requested signed by both parties recognized Housing sale and purchase agreement is invalid, the return of housing, Zou Zhongchen counterclaim on the grounds that the respondent in this appeal point of view has been stated, there is no counterclaim. Second, the combined facts of the case, the Zou Zhongchen transfer of obligations., but this obligation is a prerequisite, that is, pay off the loan Zouzhong Chen, Fujian Na only obligations. But Zouzhong Chen has also failed to pay off the loan, the What to Fujian Na help transfer? in this appeal and the counterclaim, Zou Zhongchen wish to avoid this premise, intended to confuse, distort the truth. During the trial, said the Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen malicious repayment, the loan has been paid, shall perform the transfer to Fujian Na procedures, how can such a truth? Fujian Na friends, relationship-based housing transfers to Zouzhong Chen, in the process, Fujian Na did not earn a penny, in accordance with the original transfer to Zouzhong Chen, and Zou Zhongchen Housing prices see Fujian Na said, forgetting to request the return home. If it is to make money, it would not have had Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen housing sold at the original price. agreement is signed, Fujian Na repeatedly urged Zouzhong Chen pay off the loan, good procedures for transfer, but Zou Zhongchen always money to delay .. delay period in October 2007, Fujian Na carrying out exit procedures, ask for the debt relationship can not exist in the country, Fujian Na to banks for how much the loan is not repaid, it was found Zouzhong Chen not only did not pay off the loan, and pay the monthly mortgage repayment delay times, resulting in Fujian Na repayment records under the name of many, serious damage to the Fujian Na business reputation. Even so, Fujian Na is also thought to cancel the agreement, but active negotiations to find Zouzhong Chen resolve the matter, but not to Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen not admit mistakes, but sent a letter to Fujian Na, to ; Liangbai with injuries, Kin Na recognize the agreements signed by both parties that violates the laws, administrative regulations, is invalid. the house is impossible to secretly sold to Zouzhong Chen, and sale of affordable housing is a strict legal procedures, and bought by the the human condition is a strict requirement. In sum, Fujian Na ask the court to reject the counterclaims.
Court of First Instance examined, 12 January 2003 the plaintiff Fujian Na (Party) and the defendant Zouzhong Chen ( B) signed the Module 6 Layer 2) to sell a property to Party B, Party A to Party B collects 137,425.83 yuan. Party B agree to continue to do with the name of bank mortgage Party, Party since the agreement shall be the date of signature of the bank also section. Otherwise, B should be the consequences of its own. Party in collecting the fees while the cost of required documents will be submitted with the B notes. Party A shall assist Party B to pay off bank loans procedures for transfer, transfer of ownership occurs when all the costs borne by the Party. B on January 17, 2003 to pay 100,000 yuan to the whole Party, the balance on May 1, 2003 payment, subject to the receipt of Party . agreement was signed the same day, Fujian Na Zou Zhongchen delivered to the house and relevant documents stipulated in the agreement to pay bills and Zou Zhongchen. Zouzhong Chen a one-time payment to the Fujian Na had a mortgage and other expenses totaling 137,482.30 yuan, Zou Zhongchen after the arrival of the houses were renovated. from January 2003 onwards Zouzhong Chen began to Fujian Na in the name of repayment of housing loans up to October 2007, November 2007 Fujian Na the housing loan principal and interest on the remaining a total of 195,964.67 yuan one-time pay.
another investigation, located in Changping District, East Town, 1306 Tiantongyuan Unit 1, Level 6, Building 2 houses belonging to affordable housing, Fujian Na on March 5, 2002 from Beijing Shun Days pass in real estate development limited liability company to purchase, the same year March 11 to obtain housing in the housing the right to use the certificate
the facts of a party state, the termination of loans and other documented evidence of a statement.
court of first instance verdict, Fujian Na and Zouzhong Chen signed the Housing listed for sale again or be limited transfer of the relevant provisions of the qualification, so the agreement should be legally valid. The two sides should follow the principle of good faith, to continue the full implementation of the contract. Zouzhong Chen is the first payment after the payment of the purchase and 2003 January to October 2007 bank lending, and the remaining purchase money (ie bank loans) 195,964.67 yuan paid by the Fujian Na finished yet ... so Zouzhong Chen